Sunday, December 5, 2010

Communists, Engineers and Social Media (part two)



Before making the move to consulting, I worked for a non-profit comprised primarily of engineers with a few marketers and a few engineers who wanted to dabble in marketing. To be honest, some of the engineers had great ideas and brought a useful degree of discipline to most of our projects. But some engineers just could not make the jump from engineering to marketing.  

One of my biggest on-going battles was with social media marketing. The marketing professionals on our team knew that social media marketing was the up-and-coming trend. They were all for funding social media marketing projects. The problem came from my board of directors, comprised almost entirely of engineers.

Knowing well the level of detail required to make my board comfortable with the success being achieved by marketing projects, I reported some pretty compelling metrics.   

YouTube, in particular, was yielding some great results. Compared to similar videos (for example, the YouTube videos being posted by a Fortune 100 company on our board of directors), we were a "run away success." (In the interest of full disclosure, I am only talking about 1,500 hits a year, not a viral success in YouTube terms. However...) We were getting twice as many hits per month as the Fortune 100 company was getting in a whole quarter. Additionally, we were reaching people in over 40 countries and in almost every state in the USA. We were getting plenty of positive comments and even a few decent questions. Our long standing desire to reach out to the end consumer, and to educate them on the benefits of our technology, was being achieved.

I requested approval to start promoting the videos to drive traffic. To my astonishment, I was told to cease and desist.  Even after reporting some very positive feedback from a respected marketing consultant, my board continued to discourage me from posting new content.  

The reason? "No one should be going to YouTube for technical information."

OK, I laid the facts out. Engineers are supposed to be governed by facts. We were being successful by every metric. Still, it did not fit within a reality they could accept. Things were not supposed to work this way. Rather than seeing that we could go to where the people are looking and provide accurate information, they felt that we were encouraging people to look for information in the wrong place. 

Just like facts were ineffective with the Romanian judge,  facts are not going to be enough to win all your battles in the workplace. Engineers and C-level executives are supposed to be influenced by facts but if the facts make them uncomfortable, expect resistance. They are missing the point and you will need to help them see the validity and value of a new reality.

We will dig into that in future posts. 

James Snider is a marketing consultant, responsible for developing the 3.4 billion dollar 1394/FireWire market. James has over 16 years of marketing experience with 7 years working for Fortune 100 companies, 8 years as executive director of a non-profit and, since the summer of 2009, as a strategic business development consultant.  www.linkedin.com/in/jamessnider

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Communists, Engineers and Social Media (part one)


I have a friend who grew up in Romania during the rule of Communism. As is the case with others I have known who are familiar with life behind the Iron Curtain, he has plenty of stories that amuse and confuse me.

One came to mind the other day.

There was a man in my friend's home town who accused another man of stealing a significant number of potatoes from his field right around harvest time. On the date of his trial, the accused entered the court and when asked to present his case, the man simply said, "I could not have possibly committed this crime. There were no potatoes in the field on the day I supposedly stole them."  

Of course, the accuser knew that there were potatoes in the field on the day the crime was committed. In this agrarian community, everyone (even the judge) knew when fields were harvested. This pathetic line of defense was surely going to land the accused man in jail.

However, the accused produced a copy of the official Communist newspaper for the region which stated that the harvest had been good that year and that the farmers had been efficient and had every potato in the barns two weeks early.

According to this official, state run, news source, the potatoes were in the barns a full week before the crime had supposedly been committed.

Whether it was sloppy reporting or if the government officials had seen some political advantage in exaggerating a story about the good potato harvest, this judge was not going to question the veracity of the local paper or the Communist officials quoted in it.

The man was declared innocent.

What does this have to do with engineers and marketing? I will cover that in my next post

James Snider is a marketing consultant, responsible for developing the 3.4 billion dollar 1394/FireWire market. James has over 16 years of marketing experience with 7 years working for Fortune 100 companies, 8 years as executive director of a non-profit and, since the summer of 2009, as a strategic business development consultant.  www.linkedin.com/in/jamessnider

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Emotional marketing is powerful.

In my last post, I talked about marketing to emotions or "emotional marketing." I have studied this for years and incorporated it into my most successful marketing campaigns. Recently, I ran across a good article on the topic.


James Snider is a Global Marketing professional, responsible for developing the 3.4 billion dollar 1394/FireWire market. James spent 16 years in marketing with 7 years working at "for profit" companies, 8 years as executive director of a non-profit and the past year as an independent global business development consultant.  www.linkedin.com/in/jamessnider

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Emotions!


When you talk about emotions to an engineer, you are treading on thin ice.  There is nothing they hate more than to hear about your emotions.  It is like throwing water on the witch.  However, marketers know that the most effective sales method is one that appeals to both logic and emotion.  You can convince someone that your product is the right choice, but an little emotional push will move them to make the purchase.


The problem is, "using emotions to sell a product" sounds manipulate to an engineer.  They want to give their customer all the facts so they can make a logical decision. This would make sense, given the logical nature of engineers, however, any good marketing person knows how to sell his/her product to his/her customer.  When left to pure logic, there is a lack of a sense of urgency to take action and the danger of "analysis paralysis."


Let's remove the word "emotion" and substitute "motivation."  How do we motivate the engineering customer to stop analyzing and to select our product without extensive research?  To do this, we need to determine what motivates them. About what are they passionate?

James Snider is a Global Marketing professional, responsible for developing the 3.4 billion dollar 1394/FireWire market. James spent 16 years in marketing with 7 years working at "for profit" companies, 8 years as executive director of a non-profit and the past year as an independent global business development consultant.  www.linkedin.com/in/jamessnider

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Digital Tonto


If you are not reading Greg Satell‘s (Digital Tonto) blog, you are missing some of the best marketing content on the internet.  He is always interesting and informative….and he always makes me wonder how I have gotten this far in life and know so little.  Here is an excerpt from his most recent blog posting:
From “Marketing Memes”
Two Hunters
Memes can spread in lots of different ways for lots of different reasons.  Susan Blackmore, in her book The Meme Machine, describes how altruism can spread memes through a story about two successful primitive hunters, Kev and Gav.  Kev, is a nice guy who shares his meat while Gav is a bit more selfish and keeps the proceeds from his hunt to himself.
Blackmore notes that Kev will come into contact with more people and they will be more likely to copy his style of hunting  (i.e. type of bow and quiver, etc.).   Moreover, other memes of his will be transferred as well, such as the type of feathers he adorns himself with, songs he likes to sing, etc..
Gav’s memes won’t be as successful.  He won’t spend as much time with others so, whatever his merits, he won’t get copied as much as Kev.  As information gets passed down, future generations will be more likely to adopt Kev’s memes than Gav’s.
Greg then goes on to compare Google, Microsoft, and Apple to Kev and Gav and to discuss how ideas spread.
For the complete post (and all his other excellent articles) go to www.digitaltonto.com

James Snider is a Global Marketing professional, responsible for developing the 3.4 billion dollar 1394/FireWire market. James spent 16 years in marketing with 7 years working at "for profit" companies, 8 years as executive director of a non-profit and the past year as an independent global business development consultant.  www.linkedin.com/in/jamessnider

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Ignite! Dallas, June 2, 2010


The Ignite! Dallas group is heavily populated with people who are active in the Social Media Club of Dallas.  I was fortunate enough to be one of 16 people selected (from a pool of 46) to speak at this rowdy event.  The topic of this blog was the topic of my presentation.  Please take a look:

                      James Snider's presentation at Ignite Dallas 2

James Snider is a Global Marketing professional, responsible for developing the 3.4 billion dollar 1394/FireWire market. James spent 16 years in marketing with 7 years working at "for profit" companies, 8 years as executive director of a non-profit and the past year as an independent global business development consultant.  www.linkedin.com/in/jamessnider

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

All that useful fluff


To a marketer, features are "hooks" to help them get customers interested in their product.  The more features, the more ways the product can be sold and the greater the opportunity to get more people to love the product.  


Just look at the iPhone.  It had more features than the average smart phone and engineers love it.  It was those features that made people fall in love with it (and stand in crazy long lines to get the first one....and then again to get the updated version....and then again...) A significant portion of the people standing in line to get the new iPhone were engineers. That is because marketers did an effective job of marketing it.  


But wait!  There's more!  The Droid has plenty of features, but it lacks the "cool factor" of the iPhone.  There is nothing logical about standing in line all night long to get a new phone. This brings up the importance of "emotions" in selling a product. 

More on that in my next post.

James Snider is a Global Marketing professional, responsible for developing the 3.4 billion dollar 1394/FireWire market. James spent 16 years in marketing with 7 years working at "for profit" companies, 8 years as executive director of a non-profit and the past year as an independent global business development consultant.  www.linkedin.com/in/jamessnider